Report

Example report.

Simulated. Not a client study. The sections and the verdict rule are the ones a brand receives.

Concept test · New York

Keel Lemon Water. New label against the current bottle.

Benchmark: Current pack. Bars on: head to head, price. Liking: left off. Completed: 120.

VerdictNot cleared

The new label won the pick. It missed the price. One missed bar and the study does not clear.

Bars

Head to head

Cleared
Win share
65%
95% interval
56% – 73%
Your bar
50%
Dough default
50%

78 wins, 42 losses, 8 neither. “Neither” is shown and not counted as a win. Timing-flagged battles are excluded.

Price

Not cleared
Conservative share
38%
95% interval
30% – 47%
Your bar
50%
Dough default
50%

Anchor $2.49. Generous share 52%. The bar clears only if the conservative count clears it. This is what people say they would pay — not a sales forecast.

Liking

Not tested
Status
Left off

You left this bar off. Had it been on, it would be the share who said love it or like it, asked before any choice.

First look

Each pack, rated on its own, before the battle.

New label

n = 120 · top box 33% · top two 68%

  • Love it
  • Like it
  • It's okay
  • Don't like it
  • Really don't like it

Current pack · benchmark

n = 120 · top box 23% · top two 53%

  • Love it
  • Like it
  • It's okay
  • Don't like it
  • Really don't like it

What mattered

Shoppers mark which pack attributes matter most and least. The ranking is a guide to the next design — not a second verdict.

  1. 1Looks cold on the shelf
  2. 2Easy to read the name
  3. 3Feels premium
  4. 4A bottle I already know
  5. 5Looks like it is trying

Stated, beside chosen

After the choices, shoppers rank the set. Mean pair agreement 64%. Top-pick agreement 71%(112 comparable). Speech and choice are both kept. They are allowed to disagree.

Price demand

100%0%$1.49$1.99$2.49$2.99$3.49
Dashed line is your price anchor ($2.49). Share willing to pay at or above each price.

What they wrote

  • “The new one looks colder. I'd take it if it cost the same.”
  • “I know the old bottle. This one feels like it is trying.”
  • “I'd buy the new label at the bodega. Not at that price for the week.”

Emails, links, handles and phone numbers are removed before brands see answers; names are not detected.

What to do with a “not cleared”

The pick says the label can win attention. The price says $2.49 is ahead of what these shoppers will grant it. The next study is a price, or a label that keeps the cold look and spends less effort announcing itself. The report will say if that one clears. It will use the same words.

Method, as written in the report

Confidence
95%, fixed by Dough; brands set the bars, never the confidence.
Result rule
Cleared when the whole interval sits at or above the bar, not cleared when it sits below, too close to call when it straddles; fewer than 10 answers reads as not enough responses.
Head to head
Each respondent's single direct battle between the design and the benchmark (scoring rounds, timing-flagged battles excluded); Wilson interval. Neither answers are shown and not counted as wins.
Liking
Share answering Love it or Like it, asked before any battle. Against your current pack it is the paired difference on the same respondents.
Price
Stated willingness to pay at or above your price, never a sales forecast. Price bands are ranges, so the share is a range: it clears only if even the conservative count clears the bar.

See this for your own design.

A person reviews every request and writes back.